Fuels produced from plants are
considered to be biofuels. Biofuels are mainly ethanol and sometimes butanol,
which whilst being a better fuel, is actually much harder to obtain from plants
than ethanol. Both ethanol and butanol are alcohols produced from crops by
fermentation of sugars that are present within the crops. Plants such as wheat,
corn, sugar beets, sugar cane, molasses and any other sugar or starch
containing plants can be used for biofuels, even potatoes. During ethanol
production an enzyme is used to break down the starches in the crops into
sugars, then fermentation of sugars occurs followed by distillation and drying.
In 2010, global biofuel production was at 105 billion liters and provided
almost 3% of fuels required for road transport. Most of the ethanol is produced
in Brazil although USA also does not lag far behind.
Ethanol itself is lower energy
fuel than petroleum per unit volume however it does prove to be more efficient
and hence more environmentally friendly in this sense. Ethanol can actually be
used in petrol engines instead of petrol if it is mixed with petrol where up to
15% of the fuel can be ethanol. Although larger fuel volumes by approximately
30% are required when ethanol becomes involved, the price of biofuel currently
remains lower than that of pure petroleum.
However not everything is so
pretty and shiny with biofuels. As with many new technologies, lack of research
suggest that it remains uncertain whether it takes more energy to produce
biofuels than is recovered. The distillation process requires a very high
energy input for heat as well as energy being required for farm equipment,
cultivation, planting, fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides and fungicides,
which are all made from oil, when growing the crops for biofuels. Irrigation
systems, harvesting, transport, fermentation and drying all also require
further energy inputs (Russo, 2008).
The other dark side of
biofuels that is known as an ongoing debate called food energy and environment
trilemma (Butterbach-Bahl, 2013).
This debate is about crops grown on
fields and farms for biofuels threatning food supplies. It has not been
properly investigated whether there is sufficient land available to produce the
crops needed in sufficient amounts for common biofuel use by the general
public.
Some other difficulties may
arise in the cultivation of biofuels such as the process of plant growth being
highly seasonal in many regions of the world and climate dependent hence not
all countries would be able to implement it. Also disease and insects may
destroy crops and sometimes these things get out of hand potentially leaving
the human population starving for oil and without energy supply if there was no
other energy back up available.
Ethanol has also shown to be
corrosive for today’s oil infrastructure such as piping networks and ships thus
it would require infrastructure adjustments and replacements and thus
investment if it was to become a global energy source (Savage, 2011).
It also produces less energy than petroleum as shown by figure 1
below but research is currently under way to try and find an easy, cheap and
environmentally friendly way to either synthesize butanol and other larger
hydrocarbons from ethanol or to ferment these large hydrocarbons directly from
the crops themselves.
Figure 1.
Source: Savege, 2011.Energies available from biofuels
compared to traditional fuels.
Finally, vegetable oil has
also been recognized as a source of fuel when burned. This is because it
contains fatty oils. The fatty oils are also produced by palm trees and soya,
so research into these plants is also currently being done as well as algae
which are also believed to be a good potential source of biofuel. Some studies
such as the one by Savage, 2010 actually argue that the only viable and
efficient biofuel that can be produced will be from algae as it can be
affordable in large enough volumes for biofuel to become the new global energy
source.
Some studies suggest that
biofuels could provide up to a quarter of global transport fuel by 2050 but
this is highly debatable and would require a lot of research, investment and
new technologies to be invented for the myth to become reality. There is
currently a lack of evidence to show that biofuels are associated with lower
GHGs emissions than fossil fuels when the full life cycle of their production
and combustion are considered. However the governments of more than 35
countries have already established policies promoting the use of biofuels which
is especially evident in Brazil, USA and countries within the EU
(Butterbach-Bahl, 2013).
So in conclusion, whilst biofuels sure
do seem a cleaner option of energy production than non-conventional oil, we can
only hope that enough research is done into the area before it becomes our new
reality and yet again we dup ourselves into something that we can no longer get
out of such as the irreversible anthropogenic global warming that we have
created by the combustion of fossil fuels.
No comments:
Post a Comment