In a world desperately thirsty
for oil, the Arctic and its resources seems a very appealing option. With
increasing demand for oil and increasing prices, there has been higher interest
shown regarding the Arctic on the global scale. In 2008 US Geological Survey
estimated that the are north of the Arctic Circle has 90 billion barrels of
undiscovered, technically recoverable oil and 44 billion barrels of natural
gas. This represents 13% of the expected undiscovered oil in the world (USGeological Survey, 2008).
The Arctic Circle appears to
encompass 6% of the Earth’s surface, one third of which is found above sea
level and another one third is in continental shelves beneath less than 500 m
of water. The rest is deep ocean basins historically covered by ice (Gautier, 2009). Deep oceanic waters
are known to have low oil potential at the moment but the continental shelves
of the Arctic potentially have very high recoverable oil hidden within them.
Until very recently the Arctic was seen as a very remote and technically
difficult region to access with high costs of oil recovery. Whilst low-cost
recovery oil was still widely available, little exploration was done in the
Arctic. Some offshore wells have been drilled such as those in Mackenzie Delta,
the Barents Sea, offshore Alaska and the Sverdrup Basin but even these were
seen as economically unsustainable and hence were abandoned (Gautier, 2009).
However now there is an
increasing interest in the Arctic due to various factors. Firstly after decades of substantial ice
melting, the Northwest east passage can become a viable transportation route
hence the Arctic becomes more accessible following the major decline in ice
cover since 1987 (Harsem, 2011). Secondly in 2007 Russia
planted a deep sea flag at the North Pole- Arctic region as an important
evidence of leadership of the Kremlin. Third oil prices increases push for new
discoveries to sustain high demand for oil. Finally in 2008 US geological study
stated that about ¼ of the world’s undiscovered oil is probably located in the
Arctic.
The exploration of the Arctic
oil is still considered more technically challenging than any other
environment. The USGS estimates that 84% of the oil and gas there is located
offshore which means it is more difficult and expensive to recover than the oil
and gas from onshore oil fields. Furthermore the US Geological Survey (USGS)
did not consider economic factors such as the effects of permanent sea ice or
oceanic water depth in its assessment of undiscovered oil and gas resources (USGeological Survey, 2008).
Nevertheless all these difficulties don’t seem to scare the northern countries
in the race to obtain these territories with the aim of exploration them for
resources. The four Arctic countries- Russia, US, Canada and Norway are already
looking to expand their activities in the Northern region whilst Iceland and
Greenland are looking at becoming oil and gas producers. Figure 1 below shows
the oil fields that are assessed by the USGS in their 2008 report about the
Arctic oil. It is obvious that with oil being as highly valued resource as
gold, new formations and the right of exploration could create major
geopolitical conflicts between the countries involved. It is especially
worrying as Russia and USA are involved- historical opponents and competitors
against each other so perhaps we have a worry of another cold war approaching!?
Russia has already landed some deep sea flags in the area to try and claim the
northern territories.
Figure 1.
Source: USGS, 2008. Location of Arctic Basins assessed by
the USGS.
Whilst little research is done
to this day regarding the Arctic, its resources and whether they are
economically sustainable to recover, evidence seems to suggest that the region
certainly has a fair amount of unexplored resources buried under the surface.
All of the northern countries that have potential access to the area are
currently undertaking research into the area and its resources. Perhaps the
Arctic oil is our solution to the problem of scarcity of oil and will push the
peak oil point further away from what it could be otherwise hence oil is a
worry for a very distant future. Also perhaps it could mean that
non-conventional oil resources do not need to be explored just yet meaning high
costs and likewise renewable energy is not the only solution.
No comments:
Post a Comment